HMCS Consults on Regulations -

Her Majesty's Court Service (HMCS) has begun the consultation exercise which should eventually lead to the regulation of enforcement agents. Following the passing of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 HMCS is now consulting with stakeholders, including the ESA, in order to take forward the process of creating regulations. The Association, in speaking to officials, has voiced concern over a number of issues including the up-front fee, the proposed three month time limit for taking control of goods, forced entry, the sale of goods following seizure and the use of the Security Industry Authority as a regulatory body. HMCS has indicated its willingness to listen to stakeholders' concerns and the Association is hopeful that, whatever the final outcome may be, it provides a system which is beneficial to creditors and debtors as well as enforcement agents.

HMCS - New Fee Structure

After what seems an age HMCS and the Ministry of Justice have begun work on introducing new regulations for enforcement agents following the passing of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. HMCS has sent out forms (known as Requests for Information (RFIs)) to bailiff firms requesting information on the work they do, how much it costs them and the charges made for carrying out such work. The purpose of the information gathered from the forms is to provide material to enable HMCS to formulate a fee structure for enforcement. Ideally, this will be a clear, simple to understand system which will remove many of the current anomalies in the present fee structure. HMCS will subsequently publish a formal consultation paper setting out its proposals and asking for comments. In addition to the form, the ESA and ACEA have jointly submitted a paper setting out comprehensive details of a fee structure which we believe will satisfy the main concerns of government. Rather than making a charge for each individual act, the paper puts forward a scheme for charging a fixed fee for groups of actions which should ensure a) that the bailiff is fairly remunerated and b) that debtors are absolutely clear as to what they will have to pay and the reasons they are paying it. The paper has been endorsed by the BPA.

Ministerial Statement - TCE Act 2007

Ministers have made an announcement following the review of Parts 3 & 4 of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. In written statements presented to both Houses of Parliament Ministers said that they had decided not to implement Part 4 of the Act but have decided to implement Part 3 save for those provisions which would have extended bailiffs' powers of entry. Three specific measures will be initiated shortly including the creation of an on-line bailiff certification register and the inclusion of CRB checks as part of the application process for certification. The third measure; minimum training requirements and competences for bailiffs, awaits further details. Ministers state that the intention is to implement "full independent regulation" by 2012 but with a General Election due to take place in 2010 it remains to be seen whether or not such regulation ever takes place.

Certificated Bailiffs Online Register

The Certificated Bailiff Register, recently published on Her Majesty's Court Service (HMCS) website, contains a large number of errors and omissions, despite the full co-operation of our members in providing up to date information. We are very disappointed that such a public register is not completely accurate and reliable. The Enforcement Services Association has reluctantly come to the conclusion that no one, whether they be member of the public, professional or volunteer adviser or anyone working in the sector, should rely on the register to check whether or not a bailiff is certificated. Despite the inadequacy of the HMCS register we remain committed to assisting the Government in the provision of accurate and up to date information on the sector.

Media stories

ESA is very concerned that it has been quoted in two recent stories in the Daily Mail and Daily telegraph. We would confirm that no official quotes have been given to either publication, and that we do not recognise the statistics referred to in the articles. We are concerned that the two journalists concerned do not appear to have done their research thoroughly on an important subject

NOS Consultation response

We are pleased to confirm that, after a great deal of work from the sector representatives, the Enforcement Agents Suite of NOS is now available for Industry Wide Consultation on the Skills for Security website. You can access the consultation at the following address: We would urge all members to view and respond to the consultation direct. If you would prefer not to but would like to have a point made, then please let us know and we will respond on your behalf. The closing date for responses is the 7th January 2011. 0A

Merger with ACEA

On 26th January 2011 the members of both the Enforcement Services Association (ESA) and the Association of Civil Enforcement Agencies (ACEA) voted overwhelmingly in favour of a merger into one association. The new association will be called the Civil Enforcement Association. However, until the administrative procedures have been completed for the new association, both ESA and ACEA will continue to run in parallel under a single management structure.

Bolton Parking Case

On 22nd June 2011 his Honour Judge Holman, sitting at Bolton County Court, nailed the twin myths that warrants of execution from the Traffic Enforcement Centre were invalid if they were not issued to an enforcement company in paper format by the relevant authority and/or that a copy of the warrant was not produced upon demand by the debtor. The cottage industry that has been building up upon these two spurious contentions has finally been shown to be giving false hope and ill-informed advice to those foolish enough to support it financially. It is, however, unfortunate that the defendant in this particular case is likely to pay a high financial penalty through poor advice from those seeking to profit from his misfortune and enhance their own business interests. 0A

Executive Council

Simon Jacobs     Mervyn Pilley
Mike Shang     Dave Cornes

David Chapman
Paul Kelly
Islwyn Lewis-Jones
Andrew Rose
Michael Shang
Simon Sutor
Paul Whyte
Mike Garland
Bernard Chinnery
Howard Jones
Andy Coates
Ian Macdonald
Paul Sharpe

2008-2010 J. Green-Jones
2006-2008 P. Sharpe
2004-2006 I. Lewis-Jones
2002-2004 M. Garland
2000-2002 A. Rose
1998-2000 G. Mitchell
1997-1998 C. Adams
1995-1997 M. Sullivan
1993-1995 G. Smith
1992-1993 M. Julious
1991-1992 P. Birchall
1989-1991 S. Sutor
1987-1989 I. Feldman
1986-1987 W. Madagan
1984-1986 S. Simcox
1982-1984 A. Moss
1980-1982 G. Darby
1978-1980 R. Mann
1976-1978 B. Wigley
1975-1976 C. Finlay
1973-1975 B. Peachman
1972-1973 O. Lewis
1970-1972 L. Crilley
1968-1970 P. Heims
1967-1968 S. Gillespie
1966-1967 G. Duncan
1965-1966 R. Aylen
1963-1965 L. Horton
1961-1963 D. Madagan
1959-1961 M. Hopker
1957-1958 H. Kemp
1956-1957 M. Hopker
1953-1956 W. Ralph
1950-1953 G. Green
1948-1950 P. Kemp
1947-1948 O. Kew
1939-1942 W. Lowman
1938-1939 A. Baker
1937-1938 S. Grant
1936-1937 H. D Arcy
1935-1936 F. Groves
1934-1935 F. Vining
1933-1934 Capt. W. Kilburne
1932-1933 L. Coe
1931-1932 P. Neale
1930-1931 H. Coe
1929-1930 D. Pusser
1928-1929 G. Wheeler
1926-1927 W. Esmond-Reeve
1924-1926 W. Vernon-Pearson
1923-1924 L. Steeds
1922-1923 L. Stean
1921-1922 B. Ford
1920-1921 J. Pusser
1918-1920 P. Green
1916-1917 A. Collins
1914-1915 Sir. E. Evans
1912-1913 I. Goldstein


Mike Shang